America's Schizophrenic Approach to Airline Policy

Concept for the 777X Image courtesy Boeing

Sure, Emirates, Qatar Airways, Etihad and Lufthansa have together placed the largest order Boeing has ever received - $76 billion from Emirates alone - for its new model Boeing 777X, still under development. The way Emirates is spinning it, that's seventy-six billion real live American greenbacks headed this way as opposed to, say, Airbus, based in France. 

U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker and Washington State Senator Maria Cantwell joined the foreign carrier in expressing delight. It is a "win/win for our economy and our workers," Secretary Pritzker said. No wonder Emirates is thrilled. No wonder a number of U.S. based airline workers are furious.

"The Middle East carriers are threatening all U.S. aviation," said Dino Atsalis, a Delta Air Lines captain and the head of the government affairs group for Delta pilots for ALPA. The 777 manufacturing jobs won't compensate for the jobs that will be lost if foreign carriers continue to poach passengers from U.S.-based airlines.

"They don't have labor protection laws in these foreign countries that protect like we do here," Atsalis told me. He said that as airlines like Emirates increase market share in other countries, those nation's airlines will suffer, citing Qantas, which entered into a code share with Emirates in 2012.

"Qantas is a shell of itself, it has become a feeder for the routes that Emirates is flying," he said.

Nick Calio photo courtesy A4A

"Our issues are non-partisian," Calio told me at the International Air Transport Association's annual meeting in Cape Town in June. The way the United Arab Emirates has used air transport "as a strategic asset" to boost and diversify its oil-based economy is great for them and nothing like America's policy, Calio said, because there is no policy.

Instead, American politicians turn their attention to the airlines only in response to the complaints of passengers, who may or may not even recognize that the deteriorating experience of air travel is not entirely the fault of the airlines. There's plenty of blame to go around. 

Don't get me wrong. The U.S. airlines are plenty flawed. But they are hobbled by the fact that the government involves itself in aviation only to levy taxes on tickets while feigning concern about fares or to pander to passenger complaints about personal electronic devices and tarmac delays.

The American Airlines/US Airways debacle is the most recent example. Really, what was Justice Department opposition all about? After allowing merger after merger over the past decade, all of a sudden, this particular marriage is anti competitive? Never in the history of airline hookups (okay, I'm making that up, but it seems right) has an airline pairing been so welcomed by so many principals.

Using ticket prices as the litmus test is itself flawed. As A4A is happy to point out and was reiterated in this excellent article by The Atlantic's Derek Thompson, the cost of traveling by air has plummeted over the years. Fares are so low that many people don't think twice about hopping on an airplane. And between budget carriers and legacy airlines, a broad range of fares is usually available.

My observation of the global aviation industry leads me to believe that for the most part, Calio and Atsalis are correct. Our nation's lack of a strategic plan for aviation is just messed up.

So congratulations to Boeing for making a fist full of dollars selling planes to foreign airlines. But when bureaucrats and politicians are finished celebrating that particular victory, it will be time to sit down with the rest of the industry and hammer out a plan that U.S. airlines, American workers and passengers can also celebrate. Correction: It will be long past time.